Of course, we cannot know The Future. Think about trying to predict the Future in 1900: World War I, The Great Depression, World War II, the Cold War, etc. Even after the fact, we have trouble explaining what happened in the InterWar Period. Yet, we persist. We try to predict the effects of Climate Change. We try to predict the path of Hurricanes. We try to predict next Quarter's Economic performance.
Our vision for all this effort is (1) Science Fiction Psycho-Historian Harry Seldon created a hand-held device called the Prime Gradient that predicts the collapse of the Galactic Empire in the Foundation Trilogy and (2) Limits to Growth Engineer J. Wright Forrester created a computer program, World1, that predicted the collapse of the World System in 2050 as a result of resource shortage. These aren't the work of cranks. Issac Asimov was a scientist. J. Wright Forrester taught at MIT.
It is a mistake to think anyone knows the future. It is unknowable. What I think we can do is Explore the Future with state space models, systems analysis, multi-model inference and scenario construction. Some scenarios constructed in this manner are too awful to contemplate and must be avoided at all costs. An entire group of middle-range scenarios will seem likely but the best model cannot be chosen in advance. Systems are too complex and there is significant random error. An example of my approach is Five Futures for Russia in which I use five models of the Russian SocioEconomic system to construct statistical scenarios for the future (one is a statistical surprise). You can actually run the Business as Usual Model (BAU) on line here.
Computer simulation of statistically estimated systems models is essential. We have to get beyond the stage of arm-chair speculation which still seems to be the privileged mode of academic discourse based on The Classics. When faced with having to make predictions about the future of Climate Change, the science-based IPCC made the right choice: simulation and scenario construction. The Social Sciences have supplied few useful models for the IPCC project. Neoclassical Economics has provided the DICE Integrated Assessment Model but it is based on flawed neoclassical assumptions and is not statistically estimated or tested.
Here is some more detail on my approach. The methodology is all readily available and it remains for the Social Sciences to make a serious effort to apply it.
No comments:
Post a Comment